Speaker for the Living

6Sep/090

Problem with socialism is, eventually you run out of other people’s money

And that's what these "small business owners for socialized health care" do not realize.

Let me first say that I do not believe these people are astroturfing. Absent an evidence to the contrary, I believe that they were demonstrating to say what they believe in the heart of their hearts. However, you have to question if they thought the issue through:

"We feel health care is a right, not a privilege," said Julie Nymann, the owner of Espresso 77, a Jackson Heights espresso bar where the group met. "Yet, we are a small business and we cannot afford to provide insurance to our employees. Something has to be done."

So, Ms. Nymann, as a small business owner, cannot afford to provide health insurance to her employees. I understand that. Health insurance should never have been tied to a job, and people should have been free to choose an insurer in the open market, free from all but minimal regulation to prevent fraud and other crimes. But, as the things are now, Ms. Nymann cannot afford to provide health insurance as a job benefit to her employees, and that's why she wants socialized health care, so that someone else will pay for the health insurance she wants so much for her employees.

I guess that's socialism right there: "Can't someone else pay for this?"

Of course, the problem is when that "someone else" becomes you. As a small business owner, Ms. Nymann is that "someone else" to everyone that's not her. For example, does Ms. Nymann know that ObamaCare includes 8% payroll tax to employers who do not provide qualified health insurance? Can she afford to pay that? How much of that will be coming out of her employees' check?

It's possible that provision will come out in the final version that gets passed (if one gets passed at all), but the truth is, somebody will have to pay for the public option, especially if that public option is to cover undocumented immigrants—who, by the way, cannot pay tax legally so will definitely not be paying for it.

I do not doubt that some small business owners are for ObamaCare in its most socialistic form. After all, being small business owner does not make one an avowed capitalist, and nor does it make one immune from loving "free lunch". But I do seriously doubt that whether a majority of them "like the majority of the American people" support socialized health care. Majority of Americans do support some change in our current health care system, but the change they have in mind is not the change Obama believes in. If you need an example, take tort reform, which has a broad base of support but Obama refuses even to mention.

24Jul/090

The world likes Obama because birds of a feather flock together

There are reports of polls of Obama's popularity worldwide.(via HotAir.com).

It's quite simple to understand really. The world is socialist, largely, and most of the west is "welfare state". As for Asia, well, just look at the politics in China, Korea, or Japan: freedom and individualism, the hallmark of American political philosophy, is the very last thing on anyone's mind (they care more about things like "respect for elders" and berating the younger generation), and they have truly fascist states (well, at least in Korea), in the sense that the intertwining ties between the government and megacorporations cannot be separated if one tried.

And any sensible person will agree that Obama is for "spreading the wealth" (i.e. welfare state), and that his policies are socialist (strong support for union, as shown in recent GM and Chrysler deals, for one) in nature.

So, the socialist world likes a socialist U.S. president. Should that be news?

A better question is how this benefits U.S. Well, we have no troop support in Afghanistan or Iraq from our so-called allies (except for U.K.), and there is no influx of funds from foreign investors (unless you count the Chinese buying treasury bonds). How does this "good will" translate into anything remotely useful in the real world?

In the meantime, Obama's socialism is doing fairly real harm to our economy, and his policies are rapidly eroding the American values. I just hope Lincoln's famous words hold even in this modern world:

By the frame of the Government under which we live this same people have wisely given their public servants but little power for mischief, and have with equal wisdom provided for the return of that little to their own hands at very short intervals. While the people retain their virtue and vigilance no Administration by any extreme of wickedness or folly can very seriously injure the Government in the short space of four years.

15Jul/090

Obamacare: How's it working out in Canada?

via HotAir.com

He actually seems to do a very good (and thorough) job covering the issue and the, ah hem, case study of that in our neighbor, so I'm not sure if I have anything to add.

But he does say something that I want to bring attention to: "The rich will always be able to afford private care." And that's true in a lot of other situations. The rich will always be able to avoid the plague that falls upon the general population. The pharaoh could find fresh water when Moses turned the Nile into blood. Of all the reasons to push our country into socialism, jealousy of the rich is the worst reason—because if you are middle class, you are just digging a grave for yourself. The rich will always find some other way. They are creative and resourceful. That's why they are rich.

18Apr/090

When doctors go Galt

HotAir.com reports:

What happens when government regulation makes it more expensive to bill for medical services than providers receive? More and more, providers opt out of those systems like Medicare and Medicaid, and patients have to go out of pocket to see specialists. And if you think that will change in universal health care, think again (via Instapundit)

"Who is John Galt?"

Perhaps one way to get rid of all this socialism nonsense is to let it run wild; let it run its course. When it has run its course, destroyed the society, and fallen down, like the good ol' USSR, we can try re-building everything again, based on sound, scientific, time-proven principles that need no appeals to mob mentality as socialism does.

It would be painful years as this disease runs its course, but at least when it's all over, no sane person can argue that socialism can work—it has been tried in USSR, and it would have been tried in U.S. by the time it's all over. Only the mentally ill could possibly claim that it could ever work in the next thousand years.

18Apr/090

Why Is Connectivity So Cheap In Stockholm?

Some guy asks on Slashdot:

lpress writes "Symmetric, 100 Mbps service in Stockholm costs $11/month. Conditions in every city are different, but part of the explanation for the low cost is that the city owns a municipal fiber network reaching every block. They lease network access to anyone who would like to offer service. The ISPs, including incumbent telephone and cable companies, compete on an equal footing."

Simple answer: because they already paid for it ... in taxes. It may have been sales tax, or it may have been property tax. It's so "cheap" because it was already paid for. From this perspective, it's not cheap at all, and in fact, it's outrageous that they are charging anything for it seeing that the people who are being charged already paid for it in taxes.

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody always pays.

7Feb/090

Obama imposes salary cap on bailed-out bank bosses

Guardian reports:

Wall Street bosses whose banks are being bailed out by the US taxpayer will not be able to earn more than $500,000 (£345,000) a year, President Barack Obama warned today as he vowed to clamp down on the "customary lavish bonuses".

With this, the communistification of America begins. Nearly 20 years after Reagan's victory over U.S.S.R., it turns out Russia wins after all.

These banks would be better off going bankrupt (or being sold to the highest bidder) than accept the bailout (with or without this ridiculous clause that would make them perpetual bottom feeders, because with a cap on salary, a company cannot attract the most qualified CEOs).

I hope the public whoop the Democrats' asses next election, for all the lies they told during the last election about how they weren't communists.

Pages

Categories

Blogroll

Archive

Meta